A recent news item little noticed apart from gig economy wonks like me was the fact that the government is planning to get data on how many workers actually populate the "gig economy." Labor Secretary, Thomas Perez, announced at the end of January that the department would team up with the Census Bureau and restore the Contingent Worker's Supplement as part of the May 2017 Current Population Survey.
It is being restored because in 2005, in the infinite wisdom of governmental agencies, the decision was made to discontinue data collection in this area. The Supplement had only been published 5 times and in fairness, it had its share of critics. A major failing, was the fact that it aggregated all contingent work arrangements, from senior management consultants to security guards to cab drivers. As such, drawing conclusions about income trends, potential wage and hour infractions or economic security was difficult. Similarly, no attempt was made to try reconcile the differences between the self employed - a broad category which consultants, architects and dry cleaners - and 1099 tax filers.
Now that the gig economy appears to be fundamentally redesigning work and income structures in the US economy, the Labor Department wants to try to get a handle on the phenomenon in large part to better inform policy decisions. They do acknowledge that it will be difficult, since just the definition of what qualifies as contingent work is controversial. Additionally, one would hope that they will make strides to refine the data to be able to draw more meaningful conclusions. That said, we should not get too excited, since this there won't be data until early 2018 at best.
What is ironic to me, as someone who has been involved in the high-end of the contingent work force for nearly 30 years,especially now in this political season is the constant emphasis on jobs creation as a metric of economic success. When you consider 53 million people, according to The Solo Project, have chosen to define themselves as independent consultants , free agents or free lancers, the magnitude of the data problem becomes apparent. These people do not want traditional jobs. What labor statistics are capturing this? Lets hope Perez can fix the data problems inherent in the Contingent Workforce Supplement, because the world of work is being redefined quickly and the government needs to catch up.